Category: Rubrique

  • New Somalia President to be Chosen Today

    Today September 10, Somalia’s parliament is choosing a new president for the war-torn nation in a secret ballot on Monday.

    A total of 25 candidates have each paid a $10,000 fee to contest for the top job.

    Some of the key candidates.

    SHARIF SHEIKH AHMED

    President since 2009, the former geography teacher is one of the strongest candidates, despite criticism by many that he has amassed a giant campaign chest through rampant corruption, claims he rejects.

    Former Islamist colleagues with the Al-Qaeda linked Shebab insurgents have since vowed to kill the cleric for leading the Western-backed government.

    He comes from the town of Jowhar and belongs to the Abgaal branch of the Hawiye clan, a prominent clan in central Somalia and Mogadishu.

    ABDIWELI MOHAMED ALI

    Prime minister in the last administration, the US-educated economist hails from the northern Puntland region. He is also seen as another possible winner.

    ADULLAHI MOHAMED FARMAJO

    A former prime minister from the Marehan Darod clan in southern Somalia’s Gedo region, Farmajo is reportedly popular on the streets of Mogadishu but is not seen as a likely winner. He was educated in Somalia and the US.

    ABDULLAHI AHMED ADDOW

    Former finance minister under toppled dictator Siad Barre and ambassador to the US, Addow hails from southern Somalia and the Habar Gedir sub-clan of the Hawiye.

    ABDIRAHMAN MOALIM ABDULLAHI BADIYOW

    A former army colonel and senior leader of the Al-Islah party, Somalia’s Muslim Brotherhood.

    ABDIWELI ELMI OMAR GONJEH

    Former deputy prime minister and transport minister in the transitional government, from the Majarteen sub-clan of the Darod.

    AHMED ISMAIL SAMATAR

    A formidable academic specialising in international politics and economics, a Fulbright scholar and author of multiple books on Somalia, Samatar took a leave of absence as a professor at Macalester College, in the US state of Minnesota, to contend for the top post.

    YUSUF GARAD

    A respected journalist who once worked for Radio Mogadishu, Garad retired as head of the BBC’s Somali service to compete for the presidency.

    After a first degree in Mogadishu, he studied in Italy and France, before completing a masters degree in international affairs in the US.

  • 25 Candidates Compete for Somalia Presidency

    In Somalia, 25 candidates will compete for the post of President.

    All the 25 candidates have met the conditions required to run for Somalia’s landmark presidency.

    The country’s Parliamentary Election Committee running the anticipated contest announced.

    According to committee spokesman Osman Libah Ibrahim, 33 hopefuls had picked up the nomination forms by Thursday’s deadline while 25 were deemed to have met the required threshold.

    Somali’s parliament will elect a new President as a number of obstacles including security considerations prevented the holding of a universal vote.

    The candidates meeting the requirements include incumbent President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, outgoing prime minister Abdiweli Mohamed Ali, former premier Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed Farmajo and current MPs Professors Ahmed Ismael Samatar and Hassan Sheikh Mohamoud.

    The candidates are expected to address the new Federal Parliament on (today) September 7 and 8 and lay out their respective programmes should any of them be elected President.

  • KAGAME: Rwanda’s Priorities Focus on Development, Not Illicit Foreign Ventures

    President Paul Kagame said in an Interview with a Newyork based Metro media outlet that Rwanda plays no part in the current crisis in the DRC —he said Rwanda has no interest in ‘costly, pointless foreign adventures’ that divert Rwanda’s progress from the world’s poorest country 20 years ago to one of Africa’s most dynamic countries today.

    Below are details of the conversation as told to TONY METCALF of New York Metro. The Interview was first published August 29, 2012 4:00 a.m.
    The original intro of the conversation has been edited to suit our readers.

    Metro: On the cusp of your nation’s Security Council membership, an addendum to a United Nations report by the Group of Experts accused Rwanda of unacceptable interference in the mineral-rich eastern part of the DRC, where lawless militia and illicit business interests rule, for failure of control of a weak central Congolese government. How do you respond to these accusations?

    Paul Kagame: These accusations are not true. Our national priorities have to be directed toward our country’s development, not toward foreign ventures, in particular illicit ones.

    The history and national interest of Rwanda and the Rwandan people dictate our national orientation. Our country experienced the horrors of genocide only 18 years ago.

    Since then, on the basis of a policy of national reconciliation, more than 1 million of our people have been lifted out of poverty, over 90% of Rwandans are covered by health insurance and we are ranked by World Bank Doing Business as the third easiest place to do business in Africa, under conditions of low corruption according to Transparency International.

    We have established wonderful partnerships with development partners. We’re attempting to rebuild the structures of our society in a way whereby every Rwandan has a stake in our future.

    Metro: Many commentators, including the U.N. Group of Experts on the DRC, seem to believe historical and cultural ties to the rebel groups make it inevitable that Rwanda will get involved. You worked with these groups before, and you share ethnic and language heritage with them. Don’t you see how this causes suspicion?

    Kagame: There’s a habit in the West to view Africa and our region in particular through the outdated and erroneous prism of tribalism and ethnicity.

    Because there are Congolese of Rwandan origin, such as those you referred to in your questions, who rebel against the Congolese government, people jump to the conclusions that Rwanda must be complicit in supporting them.

    Modern Rwanda rejects this primitive outlook. We embrace our Rwandan national identity and we will pursue our national interest irrespective of events in neighboring countries, regardless of so-called tribal affiliations.

    The new Rwanda is about building an economy that delivers prosperity and opportunity for our citizens based on a robust private sector. Foreign adventures would be costly and counterproductive distractions from these challenging objectives.

    We simply cannot support a rebellion outside our border.

    The Rwandan people, put to the sword perhaps like no other in the last 50 years, know the value of peace. So do I.

    Metro: Rwanda has come in for a lot of criticism from human rights groups for alleged support for rebel groups like M23 as well as broader criticisms over your record on media and political freedoms. What is your response to these criticisms?

    Kagame: I understand that human rights groups are locked in a fierce competition for big checks from wealthy donors and they need to generate big headlines. We do not like to be lectured to by unaccountable advocacy groups acting for their financiers about how to protect the rights of our citizens.

    Human rights are not the preserve of Western activists: The definition must extend to encompass the right to the dignified life; the right to send your kids to school, for that child to get health care, for access for greater prosperity for generations to come and to have a say in the destiny of your community and country.

    Under that definition, Rwanda has nothing to learn from advocacy groups who think they own the copyright on what constitutes human rights under all conditions in every corner of the world.

    Metro: Your government is reported to view Steve Hege, coordinator of the U.N. Group of Experts — which in an addendum to its own report has accused Rwanda of fomenting unrest in eastern Congo — as having an impermissibly “benign view” of people who carried out the 1994 genocide. Is this still your view?

    Kagame: We understand that experts come to the table with a variety of preconceived ideas and opinions. We accept that, in some cases, this will work against Rwanda’s interests. But there is a point at which this translates into outright bias.

    In the case of the coordinator of the Group of Experts, he has crossed the line from expert to partisan political activist. His anti-Rwandan views are well on the record and both the methodology and falsehoods that have found their way into the offensive addendum to the report conform to his unacceptable views.

    In his prior writings this coordinator appeared as an apologist for a group of Congo-based extremist militants who have repeatedly been sanctioned by the U.N. Security Council and whose leaders are the same leaders which factually led the genocide and were labeled terrorist by the U.S.?State Department.

    It is completely unacceptable for a person with this history to sit in judgment on Rwanda or any other country for that matter. It’s really all quite extraordinary. Rwanda will not let this matter stand.

    Metro: Western governments, including the U.S., have withheld aid to Rwanda over M23 claims. What do you see as the consequences?

    Kagame: Some countries have reacted to this very flawed U.N. report by temporarily suspending aid funding to Rwanda.

    This is regrettable, because we place a high value on good relations with development partners. But we are confident that these funds will be unfrozen once we tell our side of the story.

    It is a timely reminder to Rwandans that we still have some way to travel as a nation before we are truly independent. Strong economic growth, and especially a significant increase in private sector investment, is the only sustainable path forward for Rwanda.

    The donors as recipients can undermine aid effectiveness just as easily, and this is exactly what happens when countries use the development dollar as a weapon to impose political will on smaller and less powerful countries.

    Metro: Rwanda is said to have economic interests in Eastern Congo: You are accused of looting mineral resources in the DRC.

    Kagame: This is a persistent myth. Rwanda leads the region in stamping out illegal trade in minerals. We have a functioning mineral certification process. We play by the rules. Recently we handed back to the DRC 80 tons of minerals that had been smuggled into Rwanda.

    Our geographic position dictates that our economic interests are best served by a stable and prosperous DRC, because under such conditions, Rwanda would benefit greatly from increased trade and legitimate transit of Congolese minerals.

    To this end, Rwanda supports the establishment of a so-called “Neutral Force” which has been agreed between the 11 member states of the International Conference of the Great Lakes region in Africa. This is a homegrown solution to a regional border problem.

    Metro: The New York Times quoted a report by a human rights group accusing you of running a repressive regime. How do you answer those claims?

    Kagame:They are mainly talking about laws related to genocide ideology, which I am more than happy to defend. Rwandans will not tolerate voices that promote a return to the ethnic divisionism that precipitated the genocide 18 years ago.

    To that extent, we place limits on freedom of expression in a similar way to how much of Europe has made it a crime to deny the Holocaust.

    Aside from that, Rwanda is a very open and free country. Key to our recovery as a nation has a range of grassroots, citizen-centered polices we call “homegrown solutions.” The idea that Rwanda is highly controlled from the center belies the reality, which is that citizens in every village have a powerful say in how things get done.

    We prize accountability and Rwandans are quickly adapting themselves to the possibilities of a digital economy. A lot of this talk of repression results from outdated stereotypes about Africa.

    Metro: Rwanda has been described as the “Israel of Africa.” What similarities do you see between the two? And what lessons can you learn from Israel, especially in dealings with the U.N.?

    Kagame: Like Israel, we live in a difficult neighborhood. We understand that national security is vital for economic and social progress. Our sense of national purpose has been forged in unfathomable tragedy. We also have in common critics who attack our fundamental legitimacy, or even our very right to exist.

    Israel and Rwanda both play an active part in international organizations, including the U.N., but I think it’s true that our unique experiences as nations have shaped a fierce independence that we will not relinquish.

  • Somalia Gets Speaker of Parliament

    Somalia members of parliament have elected Mohamed Osman Jawari as speaker of parliament.

    Jawari is former minister in the administration of Siad Barre, whose government was the last to control the whole country before it was toppled in 1991.

    Jawari from the Rahanweyn clan was chosen by legistilators that were sworn in last week. His rivals all withdrew from the race.

    His election means the outgoing speaker Shariff Hassan Sheik Adan is unlikely to be president when that post is filled in the coming days.

    Adan is also from the Rahanweyn clan and power is traditionally shared.

    The president is normally from a different clan to the speaker of parliament.

    Adan was a bitter rival to outgoing President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed.

    Ahmed, a moderate Islamist, is one of the front-runners in the presidential race.

  • AU Experts To Demarcate ‘The Sudans’ Disputed Borders

    An African Union group of experts on boundary demarcation is in Khartoum for talks on border demarcation and disputed areas with South Sudan days before the resumption of talks in Addis Ababa.

    The delegation was in Juba where it held similar discussions to assess Juba’s point of view on the disputed border.

    Sudan says there are only five disputed locations on the common border but Juba added four other areas saying they belong to South Sudan.

    Al-Obeid Marawah, spokesperson of the foreign ministry in Khartoum, told reporters on Sunday that the visiting delegation will hold intensive talks with the Sudanese experts on issues of border demarcation with the South Sudan.

    He further said the upcoming talks on unresolved issues in Addis Ababa are expected to last for three weeks where the parties will discuss all the issues including border and security arrangements.

    Regarding the date of the talks he said the process may start on Thursday 30 August.

    However South Sudanese government spokesperson Barnaba Marial Benjamin told reporters in Juba he expects the discussion recommence after the funerals of the late Ethiopian Prime Minister on 2 September.

    Officials in Khartoum and Juba say they are still awaiting the position of the mediation to learn more about the exact date of talks.

    ST

  • Malawi, Tanzania Disagree on Lake Malawi Ownership

    Although Tanzania and Malawi have recently said that they wouldn’t resort to war to solve the lake Malawi ownership crisis, the two neighbours have failed to agree on ownership of the lake with Malawi insisting it owns it 100%.

    During eight days of Malawi and Tanzania boarder diplomatic discussions that ended on Saturday in Malawi’s capital Lilongwe, no agreement was attained thus stalling, forcing the high-level government representatives to pursue, further, the misunderstanding from September 10, 2012 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

    This was expressed at a news Conference, Saturday, in a communiqué that was produced and signed by Malawi’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Ephraim Mganda Chiume and Tanzania’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Bernard Kamilia Membe respectively, at the end of the meeting at Bingu International Conference Centre in Lilongwe, Malawi.

    “After signing a communiqué which was produced from the discussions that representatives of both Malawi and Tanzania discussed, we are happy to announce to the media and all those who are concerned with the boarder misunderstanding issue, that we had a peaceful diplomatic negotiations in our meeting.

    “We have finally agreed to meet again on September 10, 2012 in Dar es Laam in Tanzania to continue our discussions,” reads the Communiqué.

    The meeting also agreed to allow attorney generals of the two countries to evaluate the 1890 treaty which determined the border of the lake.

    Highlighting what transpired at the meeting, Membe initially said he took the meeting as ‘very historic,’ emphasizing, “that was evidenced by having high-level officials of the two neighbouring countries engaged physically in the boarder misunderstanding between Malawi and Tanzania.”

    Minister Membe said:”The only thing I can say here is that we had good and peaceful discussions since Saturday, August 20, 2012 here in Malawi covering concerns of the two parties (Malawi and Tanzania boarder misunderstanding or disagreements.

    “I thank all the officials and representatives of the two countries to this meeting. They made our discussions easy to follow and so focused, as they worked with dedication day and night, to the extent that some of them slept late at dawn.

    “However our differences still remained unresolved, we need to go ahead with this meeting. We have agreed to meet in Tanzania from September 10 to 14, 2012,” said Membe.

    He emphatically said they should handle the Malawi and Tanzania boarder issue with a degree of diplomacy, adding that as such the media fraternity should cover the misunderstanding with a sense of fairness, responsibility and ‘ especially avoiding being provocative’.

    “We want to ensure that the people of the two neighbouring countries continue living in peace,” said Minister Membe

    He hinted that exploration activities on the border areas that were affected in the misunderstanding should discontinue, adding that they should be stalled until the Dar es Salaam meeting reached conclusion.

    Taking his turn, Chiume disclosed that the meeting was a follow up of a similar meeting the representatives of the two countries initially held in Tanzania on July 27, 2012.

    He explained that before they arrived at the signing of the communiqué in Lilongwe Saturday, August 25, 2012 they started meeting at Mzuzu Hotel on Saturday, August 20, 2012, in the Northern Region.

    Chiume said the boarder misunderstanding had existed for over 50 years, adding that it was important for the two neighbouring countries to arrive at an agreement, amicably, for people of both countries to continue undertaking their trading activities peacefully.

    “This issue has been there for 50 years, even during the time of late President Julius Nyerere of Tanzania.

    “If we take long time solving this issue diplomatically, the people of the two countries would be negatively affected. So we need to speed up the process of solving it,” appealed Malawi Minister Chiume
    He said he hoped when they meet in Tanzania in September the misunderstanding would be left to rest.

    “I hope when we meet in Tanzania in September we put the matter to rest for good and forever,” he said.

    The Malawi and Tanzania boarder issue has resurfaced as Malawi government engaged a company from Britain this year to explore on Lake Malawi and see if there were oil deposits.

    The scenario had forced President Mrs Joyce Banda of Malawi to hold tete a tete (one on one ) closed meeting during the 32nd Southern African Development Community (SADC) Summit , which was held from 17th to 18th August, 2012 in Maputo, Mozambique.

    MNA

  • Belgium Foreign Affairs Minister Begins Rwanda, DRC Visit

    The Belgian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs Didier Reynders has began a one week working trip in the Rwanda and DRC following accusations in a UN report that Rwanda was aiding congolese M23 rebels.

    Mr. Reynders will first meet the congolese government officials over the crisis in Eastern DRC and later travel to meet the Rwanda government leadership including Foreign Affairs minister Louise Mushikiwabo and President Paul Kagame.

    According to Belgium Foreign Affairs office,Reynders visit aims to “try to calm things down,” to encourage both parties to “maintain a dialogue” in “listening to the arguments of both sides.”

    While in DRC, he will hold talks with his counterpart Raymond Tshibanda, President of the National Assembly, Aubin Minaku, and perhaps with President Joseph Kabila, as well as representatives of the political opposition and civil society.

    He will also meet the “boss” of the UN Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO), the American diplomat Roger Meece.

    He will then travel to Lubumbashi, capital of Katanga province (southeast), which hosts the mining companies and the headquarters.

    Mr. Reynders will conclude his stay in Bukavu and Goma, the chief towns of North and South Kivu, the two most volatile provinces of the country, which still contain numerous armed groups.

    According to levif.be, Belgium does not currently considering and, unlike some of its European partners, to suspend development aid to Rwanda (Euros 160 Million over three years). But as usual puts the issue of eastern Congo on the European agenda.

    The fact that Rwanda has responded to the report of the expert group of the UN and is considered a “positive sign” in Brussels.

    Mr. Reynders himself has repeatedly called Rwanda “to confirm that it is willing to not be a player problem but the solution,” it provides “better border control” and “prevents any support for rebels”.

  • Egypt President to Visit Iran, a First in Decades

    Egypt’s President Mohammed Mursi will attend a summit in Iran later this month, a presidential official said on Saturday, the first such trip for an Egyptian leader since relations with Tehran deteriorated decades ago.

    The visit could mark a thaw between the two countries after years of enmity, especially since Egypt signed its 1979 peace treaty with Israel and Iran underwent its Islamic revolution.

    Under Mursi’s predecessor Hosni Mubarak, Egypt, predominantly Sunni Muslim, sided with Saudi Arabia and other Sunni-dominated Arab states in trying to isolate Shiite-led Iran.

    Until now, contacts have been channeled through interest sections, a low-level form of diplomatic representation. In May last year, Egypt, which was ruled by an interim military council, expelled a junior Iranian diplomat on suspicion he tried to set up spy rings in Egypt and the Gulf countries.

    It’s too early to assess the implications of the visit or to what extent the Arab world’s most populous country may normalize relations with Tehran, but analysts believe it will bring Egypt back to the regional political stage.

    The visit is in line with popular sentiment since Mubarak’s ouster in an uprising last year for Cairo to craft a foreign policy independent of Western or oil Gulf countries’ agendas.

    “This really signals the first response to a popular demand and a way to increase the margin of maneuver for Egyptian foreign policy in the region,” said political scientist Mustafa Kamel el-Sayyed. “Mursi’s visits … show that Egypt’s foreign policy is active again in the region.”

    “This is a way also to tell Gulf countries that Egypt is not going to simply abide by their wishes and accept an inferior position,” he added.

    The official said that Mursi will visit Tehran on Aug. 30 on his way back from China to attend the Non-Aligned Movement Summit, where Egypt will transfer the movement’s rotating leadership to Iran.

    He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not yet authorized to make the announcement.

    The trip is no surprise — it came days after Mursi included Iran, a strong ally of Syrian Bashar Assad, in a proposal for a contact group to mediate an end to Syria’s escalating civil war.

    The proposal for the group, which includes Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, was made at the Organization of Islamic Cooperation summit in Saudi Arabia’s holy city of Mecca.

    During the summit, Mursi exchanged handshakes and kisses with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in their first meeting since Mursi assumed his post as Egypt’s first elected president.

    The idea was welcomed by Iran’s state-run Press TV, and a leading member of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood said that Tehran’s acceptance of the proposal was a sign Egypt was beginning to regain some of the diplomatic and strategic clout it once held in the region.

    After the fall of Egypt’s longtime strongman Hosni Mubarak in last year’s popular revolt, officials have expressed no desire to maintain Mubarak’s staunch anti-Iranian stance.

    Last July, former Egyptian foreign minister Nabil Elaraby, who also heads the Arab League, delivered a conciliatory message to the Islamic Republic, saying “Iran is not an enemy.”

    He also noted that post-Mubarak Egypt would seek to open a new page with every country in the world, including Iran.

    Tensions have not been absent however in contacts with Iran’s clerical state since Egypt’s uprising. When a delegation of politicians and youth activists made a visit to Iran last year, one Egyptian pro-democracy activist, Mustafa el-Nagger, said his Iranian hosts claimed the revolt sweeping the Arab world was part of an “Islamic awakening.”

    He responded with a different interpretation: the anti-Mubarak uprising was “not a religious revolution, but a human evolution.”

    Any normalization between the two countries would have to be based on careful calculations.

    Majority Sunni Egypt has its own suspicions of Iran on both religious and political grounds. The country’s ultraconservative Salafis and even the moderate consider Shiites heretics and enemies.

    Since splitting from their Sunni brethren in the 7th century over who should replace the Prophet Muhammad as Muslim ruler, Shiites have developed distinct concepts of Islamic law and practices.

    They account for some 160 million of the Islamic world’s population of 1.3 billion people, and make up some 90 percent of Iran’s population, over 60 percent of Iraq’s, and around 50 percent of the people living in the arc of territory from Lebanon to India.

    In 2006, Mubarak angered Shiite leaders by saying Shiites across the Middle East were more loyal to Iran than to their own countries. His view was shared by other Arab leaders and officials, including Jordan’s King Abdullah II who warned of a Shiite crescent forming in the region.

    “The old regime used to turn any of his rivals to a ghost. We don’t want to do like Mubarak and exaggerate of the fear of Iran,” said Mahmoud Ezzat, deputy leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, of which Mursi was the leader of its political arm.

    “But at the same time, we should not take the Iranians’ ambitions lightly. As much as they don’t want us to interfere in their business, we don’t want them to interfere in our business,” he said, mentioning his group’s opposition to Iran’s “grand project to spread Shiite faith.”

    While nearly three decades of Mubarak rule left Egyptians inundated with state-spun scenarios of Iranian plots aiming to destabilize the country, many sympathize with Iran’s Islamic revolution and consider Tehran’s defiance of the United States a model to follow. Others seek a foreign policy at the very least more independent of Washington.

    A new understanding with Iran would be a big shake-up for a region that has been split between Tehran’s camp — which includes Syria and Islamic militias Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza — and a U.S.-backed group led by Saudi Arabia and rich Gulf nations.

    To add another level of complexity, there is also the fact that Islamic militant group Hamas, which rules the Palestinian enclave in the Gaza strip to the frustration of neighboring Israel, is a historical offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, the dominant force in Egyptian politics since Mursi’s election.

    Aware of the Gulf states’ anxieties over the rise of political Islam in post-Mubarak Egypt, Mursi has focused on courting Saudi Arabia. He visited it twice, once just after he won the presidency, and a second time during the Islamic summit.

    In an attempt to assuage fears of the Arab uprisings by oil monarchs, he vowed that Egypt does not want to “export its revolution”. He has also asserted commitment to the security of Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Arab allies, a thinly veiled reference to the tension between them and Iran.

    AP

  • Analysts Say Tsvangirai Comments on Draft Constitution Misleading

    Legal and political analysts say politi­cal party leaders have authority to effect changes to the Zimbabwe draft constitu­tion con­trary to what MDC-T leader Mor­gan Tsvangirai said on Wednesday after meeting South African President Jacob Zuma.

    The Sadc-appointed facilitator was in Harare on Wednesday to meet leaders of parties to the GPA to assess progress made in the implementation of the accord.

    Tsvangirai, who is Prime Minis­ter in the inclusive Government, claimed principals had no “veto power” over Copac.

    However, analysts said Copac’s role ended with the handing over of the draft constitution to the management committee — which was set up by the principals and not by the GPA.

    Harare lawyer Mr Farai Mutamangira said the basis upon which the entire constitution-making process is premised is, article 6 of the GPA.

    “Put differently the constitution making exercise derives its mandate from a political agreement, and the Principals as the parties to the GPA, have the privilege to affirm an agreement or lack thereof, as among themselves in respect of the draft constitution,” he said.

    “In doing so they do no more than exercise the contractual mandate they derive from the GPA. You will recall that the same Principals had previously drawn up and signed off as agreeable the Kariba Draft, which is annexure ” B” to the GPA.

    “Clearly the new draft is intended to supplant the Kariba Draft, and its political and legal significance is no more than the Kariba Draft, and in any event much weaker because it has not garnered a consensus of all the Parties to the GPA.

    “Unfortunately the legal significance of the new draft is that it can not assume an importance beyond that of the GPA, until the principals accept it and integrate it with the GPA and initiate the formal referendum process through parliament.”

    Mutamangira said the involvement of the select committee of parliament does not change, this position, in the absence of an Act of Parliament constituting the select committee by law, such as the select committee of Kenya which was constituted under the Constitution of Kenya Review Act number 9 of 2008.

    Prominent Harare lawyer, Mr Jonathan Samkange concurred saying referring a document to someone subjects it to the whims of the person or people it has been referred to.

    “The fact that this draft was referred to the management commit­tee which was created by the princi­pals means that the management committee was supposed to carry their mandate on behalf of the princi­pals.

    “This is just basic logic that the man­agement committee will then have to submit the document to the principals so that they can audit to see if they fol­lowed the instruction.”

    Samkange said the principals had the mandate to effect changes to the draft constitution if they felt their emis­saries did not capture what they wanted.

    He described the principals as the highest political offices with the final say on the draft constitution.

    Political analyst and Zanu-PF polit­buro member, Cde Jonathan Moyo said Tsvangirai’s statement was mislead­ing.

    He said the final draft constitution was not a product of Copac but the management committee.

    “What the Prime Minister said reflects either ignorance about Copac and its composition or a dishonest attitude and his disrespect of Sadc because everybody except the Prime Minister knows that the July 18 draft constitution was prepared by the management committee which is a forum of negotiators and not part of Copac,” Prof Moyo said.

    He said the management commit­tee was not Copac contrary to what Mr Tsvangirai said.

    “Ministers Patrick Chinamasa, Nicholas Goche, Tendai Biti, Elton Mangoma, Priscilla Misihairabwi, Moses Mzila Ndlovu and Eric Mati­nenga are the management commit­tee and none of them is a member of Copac.

    “Only Copac co-chairpersons, Paul Mangwana, Douglas Mwonzora and Edward Mkhosi are members of Copac but they had no role in the preparation of the final draft.

    “They were just used as messengers between the management committee and the drafters. It is common knowl­edge that when the management committee finished the draft, they sent it to Copac and Copac members were made to endorse it without read­ing its contents.

    Copac neither crafted this draft nor read it before their endorsement.

    “For the PM to say this is a Copac draft which cannot be amended by principals, it is either ignorance of the actual process or an expression of his disrespect of Sadc because the facts speak for themselves.

    “All along until yesterday (Wednes­day) when he met President Zuma, Tsvangirai has been saying the draft constitution would be a negotiated document.

    “Copac is not a negotiating forum but a Parliamentary Select Commit­tee which was supposed to produce a people-driven constitution and not a negotiated constitution.

    “Copac failed to do that and it also failed to publish the people’s views and the result was the draft constitu­tion was negotiated by the manage­ment committee which is a forum of GPA negotiations and that com­mittee reports directly to political principals who created it,” Prof Moyo said.

    He said the principals and their political parties would have a final say about the fate of the draft constitu­tion.

    Prof Moyo urged Mr Tsvangirai to help the process by getting his politi­cal party “to play ball”.

    Herald

  • Rwanda Enticed to Join Senates Association

    An association of senates ASSECA has enticed Rwanda to join saying it would benefit from sharing best practices with other countries that have bicameral parliaments.

    Gabriel Ndizeye Burundi’s Senate President also the current chair of ASSECA was in the country acompanied by ASSECA Secretary General Ali Abdul Yousuf.

    They met Rwanda’s Senate President Dr. Jean Damascene Ntawukuriryayo who said his institution will consider the proposal in consultation with the executive since there is a cost implication in form of membership contributions.

    “I do not see the problem with Rwandan Senatebecoming a member of ASSECA,” Dr. Ntawukuriryayo said.

    ASSECA operates in 22 Sub-Sahara African and Arab countries.
    nbv-2.jpg