Author: b_igi_adm1n

  • Mahogany Jones-Live to Perform in Rwanda

    The U.S. Embassy in Kigali will be hosting Mahogany Jones – Live, an American Music Abroad program featuring Mahogany Jones (EMCEE/Vocals), Lauren Johnson (Drummer/Percussionist) Rosyln Welch (EMCEE/Vocals) and DJ Sean Blu (DJ) from October 19 – 26, 2012 in Rwanda.

    Concert will be held Friday October 26 at 6:30 at Petit Stade and entrance is free.

    American Music Abroad is a partnership between the Association of American Voices and the U.S. Department of State designed to share America’s unique contribution to the world of music and to promote cross-cultural understanding and exchange among nations worldwide.

    The artists’ activities in Rwanda will include public concerts, master classes, lecture-demonstrations, workshops, jam sessions, media outreach, and collaborations with local musicians.

  • Snake Disrupts Kenya Killings Incquiry

    Proceedings of the Commission of Inquiry into the Tana River clashes were adjourned for 30 minutes on Thursday when a green snake appeared at the roof of the Maridhiano Hall at Minjila, Tana River sending officials scampering for safety.

    Trouble begun with an unusual chirping of birds at the roof of the hall. It attracted those in the hall to look up whereupon they noticed the green serpent coiled on the makuti fronds.

    At that time, the advocate for the Pokomo Council of Elders (Gasa) Mr Joel Obura was in the middle of making an application for the council to be granted full standing to give evidence on the clashes.

    Joint secretary Mr McDonald Oguya sent a notice to the Commission chair Lady Justice Grace Nzioka.

    Lady Nzioka gave the ‘warning snake note’ to Ms Emily Ominde, the assisting commissioner who was sitting beside her. They then waited nervously for Mr Obura to end his submission.

    When he finished, Ms Nzioka gave the assisting counsel Mr Wamuti Ndegwa the opportunity to respond to the application, after which the hearing was adjourned.

    “This Commission adjourns for two or three minutes,” she announced, and with her colleagues quickly dashed out to safety with tension building among participants who had now spotted the reptile.

    Administration Police officer Mr Amin Hussein, from the Minjila DC’s office, climbed on the roof to battle the snake. But it slithered and disappeared into the makuti roofing.

    But that was not the end of drama. The serpent re-appeared after about five minutes causing another round of anxiety.

    The three commissioners, Ms Nzioka, Ms Ominde and Mr Abdulkadir Lorot, were still at their rooms a few meters from the hall and were alerted not to come out yet.

    Pokomo elders present and staff of the Maridhiano CBO Center volunteered to pursue the snake on the roof with sticks. One of them managed to hit it. It was then dumped in a pit latrine ending the drama and to the relief of all.

    The commissioners were called in after at the end of the 30-minute interlude.

  • Snake Disrupts Kenya Killings Incquiry

    Proceedings of the Commission of Inquiry into the Tana River clashes were adjourned for 30 minutes on Thursday when a green snake appeared at the roof of the Maridhiano Hall at Minjila, Tana River sending officials scampering for safety.

    Trouble begun with an unusual chirping of birds at the roof of the hall. It attracted those in the hall to look up whereupon they noticed the green serpent coiled on the makuti fronds.

    At that time, the advocate for the Pokomo Council of Elders (Gasa) Mr Joel Obura was in the middle of making an application for the council to be granted full standing to give evidence on the clashes.

    Joint secretary Mr McDonald Oguya sent a notice to the Commission chair Lady Justice Grace Nzioka.

    Lady Nzioka gave the ‘warning snake note’ to Ms Emily Ominde, the assisting commissioner who was sitting beside her. They then waited nervously for Mr Obura to end his submission.

    When he finished, Ms Nzioka gave the assisting counsel Mr Wamuti Ndegwa the opportunity to respond to the application, after which the hearing was adjourned.

    “This Commission adjourns for two or three minutes,” she announced, and with her colleagues quickly dashed out to safety with tension building among participants who had now spotted the reptile.

    Administration Police officer Mr Amin Hussein, from the Minjila DC’s office, climbed on the roof to battle the snake. But it slithered and disappeared into the makuti roofing.

    But that was not the end of drama. The serpent re-appeared after about five minutes causing another round of anxiety.

    The three commissioners, Ms Nzioka, Ms Ominde and Mr Abdulkadir Lorot, were still at their rooms a few meters from the hall and were alerted not to come out yet.

    Pokomo elders present and staff of the Maridhiano CBO Center volunteered to pursue the snake on the roof with sticks. One of them managed to hit it. It was then dumped in a pit latrine ending the drama and to the relief of all.

    The commissioners were called in after at the end of the 30-minute interlude.

  • DRCongo: Revelator of Western Hypocrisy

    “There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. ” Sun Tzu, the Art of War

    A highly regarded observer recently posted on his blog the following: “A lie repeated a thousand times becomes information, repeated by authorities it becomes truth”. He was referring to the narrative on the DRC crisis situation, I couldn’t agree with him more.

    A couple of years ago, the Donor Community was consistent in describing the Democratic Republic of Congo as a failed state. Calls for a dramatic change in the political landscape of that country reached a record high when it came time to elect a new President.

    Such criticism from the West has come to be widely expected, as Western Powers often view themselves as morally superior and irreproachable champions of ideals of human rights and freedoms; this delusion of grandeur and sanctity governs their approach to the rest of the World, especially Africa, serving us our daily dose of dependency on aid with unwanted dictates of how we should behave while receiving it.

    The ‘white knights’ are there to protect us against “new” invaders, such as China, and serve the cause of our dependency to their systems; effectively convincing some of us Africans of our incapacity to come up with homegrown solutions to our problems, and our inability to come together in executing them for the benefit of our people. The truth stands at antipodes of this assessment, and they know that to be a matter of fact!!!

    It seems to me that their greatest fear is not to see us fail, but rather to see us succeed… without them! For it is true that we are more likely to turn away from them rather than turn the other cheek, and rightly so!

    Despite their grim depiction of Africa, a quick fact check on where we stand speaks of a totally different story; the reality is that Africa has steadily demonstrated exemplary growth, despite the current global crisis, with East Africa as its best performer in terms of economic growth; this is the result of almost two decades of stability, security and state capacity build up at a domestic and regional level.

    The East African Community is the best example to illustrate how regional integration has been beneficial for member states, in terms of economic growth, sustainable regional peace and security.

    That which was best understood by the founding fathers of the European Union after two World Wars and a continental one, didn’t escape our own analytical minds; the undisputable fact that strength lies in the numbers, that any given people are much stronger together than apart, that regional integration contributes towards economic growth, through peace and stability, and is, therefore, better than being at perpetual odds with your neighbors.

    The Great Lakes Region of Africa could easily attest to that fact, if not for the troublesome DRC! Somalia and Sudan, in contrast, are, respectively, two examples of how regional players saw it in their interest to make contextual assessments of each situation, resulting in realistic roadmaps leading to stabilization and conflict resolution. In both cases, the International Community has been loudly supporting the African initiatives.

    Why the different stance when it comes to DR Congo? Different strokes for different folks, you say? Not really. Truth be told, the mineral riches of this troubled land seem to have everything to do with this double standards ever changing approach; until recently, President Kabila was the bad guy who needed to be replaced… now he is the good guy whose ‘sins’ can be forgiven and forgotten, if only he would deliver the head of one Bosco Ntaganda on a silver platter to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    With his Presidency at stake, arresting the ex-rebel General, previously integrated in the regular army (FARDC) as a result of a peace deal, became Kabila’s number one priority as re-elected president, even if it meant plunging the country back into the pits of Hell.

    It was either that or enlisting the assistance of the very country that helped broker the peace with the CNDP: Rwanda. After the visit of Belgian Foreign Minister in Kinshasa, it became crystal clear that the chosen path was war, as Kabila made the announcement of the end of AMANI LEO (which literally means Peace Today); the gloves were officially off.

    Deprived of the wise counsel of his one-time adviser Mwanke Katumba, may his soul rest in perfect peace, Kabila found himself surrounded with warmongers who were convinced of their ability to defeat the ex-CNDP fighters, whom they believed to be in a weakened state.

    This newfound confidence in their armed forces was based on the new training received from their Belgian counterparts; according to Kabila’s entourage, victory would be swift and unforgiving!

    It is fair to conclude that the peace-loving, lesson-giving Donors pressured a poorly advised Kabila into launching a war with the risks of political escalation and setting the whole region ablaze… in the name of the WELFARE of the Congolese people!

    Interestingly, Rwanda was asked to assist in the arrest of General Ntaganda, first by the DRC, then by the Donor countries, suggesting (and where is the evidence?) that he was frequently spotted tossing beers inside our borders.

    This proved to be unacceptable to Rwanda’s Leaders, who plainly refused to subscribe to the notion that a solution for the DRC would be produced as a result of arresting a stakeholder in Congolese internal affairs; moreover, the approach was more accusatory then anything.

    Not used to taking ‘no’ for an answer, the Donors Community retaliated by openly accusing Rwanda of aiding and abetting the M23 insurgents; yet, they (Donors) are the ones to carry the full blame for the ensuing human tragedy; thousands upon thousands have lost their lives and many more fled to neighboring Rwanda and Uganda, in spite of Kigali’s warnings of such inevitable ramifications.

    Those who say that Rwanda has vested interests in Congo are partially correct: we do! But not the mercenary kind; the mineral wealth of the DRC is, indeed, not ours to share, contrary to claims from cynics and critics.

    Rwanda’s interests lie in our own prospects for regional peace and the limitless potential for economic growth through the region of the Great lakes, through mutually beneficial economic cooperation, business partnerships and intra-regional trade.

    That is what Rwanda has been doing in the past and the vision remains unchanged. The truth is that Western Donors made a tactical mistake and are now trying to make Rwanda a scapegoat , digging the ditch deep enough to bury their own guilt.

    Threats of annihilation of the M23 rebel movement in the midst negotiations for the establishment of a dialogue, by and large favored by regional players, is as reckless as it is potentially destabilizing. Why the sudden obsession with the M23?

    The FDLR, made up of remnants of the army and militia that championed the 1194 genocide, in contrast, never attracted nearly as much mobilization, yet their reign of terror and record of ruthlessness is a secret to none.

    Most troubling though is the US and UK authorities willingness to go above and beyond the call of the duty sanctioning Rwanda for a crime, they, admittedly have no tangible evidence to prove. Calls from Rwanda to be treated with fairness have been met with frozen aid and fake smiles all across the board.

    I am not so saddened by the withheld funds as I am outraged by the ease with which baseless accusations are given weight in the West when it comes to anything African. Not racist, you say?

    I beg to differ. Race is the elephant in the room nobody ever wants to talk about, because it makes people ‘uncomfortable’… well, get over it! If you are not of color, for lack of a better term, you might want to try sucking up the minor discomfort it may cause in your life for it will never amount to the level of torment it causes in ours (the coloreds).

    Western mainstream media has been propagating fictions labeled as facts without so much as second guessing their veracity for the sake of making news. And after repeating these falsehoods a thousand times, the lie became information, and as pointed out by the blogger at the beginning of this piece, authorities relayed the information and made it ‘truth’.

    Once this train had left the station, there was no turning back; not the questionable profile of Steve Hege who single-handedly masterminded the ignominious UN report, and the whole mess that ensued… not even the tearful cries for justice and peace of the suffering masses of the Kivu region.

    So why should I, as an African analyst, believe in those who have no moral authority to bring about a viable solution in this crisis? I’d rather trust the region and its stakeholders to come up with a comprehensive and lasting solution. Not a single one of them, let alone Rwanda, can afford to have this ‘Damocles Sword’ hanging over our heads for much longer.

    The wisdom of Sun Tzu in the Art of War says it best: “There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare”.

    Albert Rudastimburwa is a social commentator and media owner in Rwanda.

  • DRCongo: Revelator of Western Hypocrisy

    “There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. ” Sun Tzu, the Art of War

    A highly regarded observer recently posted on his blog the following: “A lie repeated a thousand times becomes information, repeated by authorities it becomes truth”. He was referring to the narrative on the DRC crisis situation, I couldn’t agree with him more.

    A couple of years ago, the Donor Community was consistent in describing the Democratic Republic of Congo as a failed state. Calls for a dramatic change in the political landscape of that country reached a record high when it came time to elect a new President.

    Such criticism from the West has come to be widely expected, as Western Powers often view themselves as morally superior and irreproachable champions of ideals of human rights and freedoms; this delusion of grandeur and sanctity governs their approach to the rest of the World, especially Africa, serving us our daily dose of dependency on aid with unwanted dictates of how we should behave while receiving it.

    The ‘white knights’ are there to protect us against “new” invaders, such as China, and serve the cause of our dependency to their systems; effectively convincing some of us Africans of our incapacity to come up with homegrown solutions to our problems, and our inability to come together in executing them for the benefit of our people. The truth stands at antipodes of this assessment, and they know that to be a matter of fact!!!

    It seems to me that their greatest fear is not to see us fail, but rather to see us succeed… without them! For it is true that we are more likely to turn away from them rather than turn the other cheek, and rightly so!

    Despite their grim depiction of Africa, a quick fact check on where we stand speaks of a totally different story; the reality is that Africa has steadily demonstrated exemplary growth, despite the current global crisis, with East Africa as its best performer in terms of economic growth; this is the result of almost two decades of stability, security and state capacity build up at a domestic and regional level.

    The East African Community is the best example to illustrate how regional integration has been beneficial for member states, in terms of economic growth, sustainable regional peace and security.

    That which was best understood by the founding fathers of the European Union after two World Wars and a continental one, didn’t escape our own analytical minds; the undisputable fact that strength lies in the numbers, that any given people are much stronger together than apart, that regional integration contributes towards economic growth, through peace and stability, and is, therefore, better than being at perpetual odds with your neighbors.

    The Great Lakes Region of Africa could easily attest to that fact, if not for the troublesome DRC! Somalia and Sudan, in contrast, are, respectively, two examples of how regional players saw it in their interest to make contextual assessments of each situation, resulting in realistic roadmaps leading to stabilization and conflict resolution. In both cases, the International Community has been loudly supporting the African initiatives.

    Why the different stance when it comes to DR Congo? Different strokes for different folks, you say? Not really. Truth be told, the mineral riches of this troubled land seem to have everything to do with this double standards ever changing approach; until recently, President Kabila was the bad guy who needed to be replaced… now he is the good guy whose ‘sins’ can be forgiven and forgotten, if only he would deliver the head of one Bosco Ntaganda on a silver platter to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    With his Presidency at stake, arresting the ex-rebel General, previously integrated in the regular army (FARDC) as a result of a peace deal, became Kabila’s number one priority as re-elected president, even if it meant plunging the country back into the pits of Hell.

    It was either that or enlisting the assistance of the very country that helped broker the peace with the CNDP: Rwanda. After the visit of Belgian Foreign Minister in Kinshasa, it became crystal clear that the chosen path was war, as Kabila made the announcement of the end of AMANI LEO (which literally means Peace Today); the gloves were officially off.

    Deprived of the wise counsel of his one-time adviser Mwanke Katumba, may his soul rest in perfect peace, Kabila found himself surrounded with warmongers who were convinced of their ability to defeat the ex-CNDP fighters, whom they believed to be in a weakened state.

    This newfound confidence in their armed forces was based on the new training received from their Belgian counterparts; according to Kabila’s entourage, victory would be swift and unforgiving!

    It is fair to conclude that the peace-loving, lesson-giving Donors pressured a poorly advised Kabila into launching a war with the risks of political escalation and setting the whole region ablaze… in the name of the WELFARE of the Congolese people!

    Interestingly, Rwanda was asked to assist in the arrest of General Ntaganda, first by the DRC, then by the Donor countries, suggesting (and where is the evidence?) that he was frequently spotted tossing beers inside our borders.

    This proved to be unacceptable to Rwanda’s Leaders, who plainly refused to subscribe to the notion that a solution for the DRC would be produced as a result of arresting a stakeholder in Congolese internal affairs; moreover, the approach was more accusatory then anything.

    Not used to taking ‘no’ for an answer, the Donors Community retaliated by openly accusing Rwanda of aiding and abetting the M23 insurgents; yet, they (Donors) are the ones to carry the full blame for the ensuing human tragedy; thousands upon thousands have lost their lives and many more fled to neighboring Rwanda and Uganda, in spite of Kigali’s warnings of such inevitable ramifications.

    Those who say that Rwanda has vested interests in Congo are partially correct: we do! But not the mercenary kind; the mineral wealth of the DRC is, indeed, not ours to share, contrary to claims from cynics and critics.

    Rwanda’s interests lie in our own prospects for regional peace and the limitless potential for economic growth through the region of the Great lakes, through mutually beneficial economic cooperation, business partnerships and intra-regional trade.

    That is what Rwanda has been doing in the past and the vision remains unchanged. The truth is that Western Donors made a tactical mistake and are now trying to make Rwanda a scapegoat , digging the ditch deep enough to bury their own guilt.

    Threats of annihilation of the M23 rebel movement in the midst negotiations for the establishment of a dialogue, by and large favored by regional players, is as reckless as it is potentially destabilizing. Why the sudden obsession with the M23?

    The FDLR, made up of remnants of the army and militia that championed the 1194 genocide, in contrast, never attracted nearly as much mobilization, yet their reign of terror and record of ruthlessness is a secret to none.

    Most troubling though is the US and UK authorities willingness to go above and beyond the call of the duty sanctioning Rwanda for a crime, they, admittedly have no tangible evidence to prove. Calls from Rwanda to be treated with fairness have been met with frozen aid and fake smiles all across the board.

    I am not so saddened by the withheld funds as I am outraged by the ease with which baseless accusations are given weight in the West when it comes to anything African. Not racist, you say?

    I beg to differ. Race is the elephant in the room nobody ever wants to talk about, because it makes people ‘uncomfortable’… well, get over it! If you are not of color, for lack of a better term, you might want to try sucking up the minor discomfort it may cause in your life for it will never amount to the level of torment it causes in ours (the coloreds).

    Western mainstream media has been propagating fictions labeled as facts without so much as second guessing their veracity for the sake of making news. And after repeating these falsehoods a thousand times, the lie became information, and as pointed out by the blogger at the beginning of this piece, authorities relayed the information and made it ‘truth’.

    Once this train had left the station, there was no turning back; not the questionable profile of Steve Hege who single-handedly masterminded the ignominious UN report, and the whole mess that ensued… not even the tearful cries for justice and peace of the suffering masses of the Kivu region.

    So why should I, as an African analyst, believe in those who have no moral authority to bring about a viable solution in this crisis? I’d rather trust the region and its stakeholders to come up with a comprehensive and lasting solution. Not a single one of them, let alone Rwanda, can afford to have this ‘Damocles Sword’ hanging over our heads for much longer.

    The wisdom of Sun Tzu in the Art of War says it best: “There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare”.

    Albert Rudastimburwa is a social commentator and media owner in Rwanda.

  • Mitt Romney to Declare China a ‘Currency Manipulator’

    US Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney has insisted that he would declare China a “currency manipulator” after entering White House.

    This is what previous US presidents both Mr. Obama and George W. Bush resisted doing.

    Despite intense pressure from Congress, this has caused speculation over Romney’s motivations.

    Is he serious, some international economists wonder, about carrying out an action they say could lead to a devastating tit-for-tat trade war and even, in the extreme, to an economic depression in the US if China reacted by no longer buying US Treasury debt?

    Some political analysts assume that Romney would simply forget his pledge once in office.

    Others say, “Don’t bet on it” – but they also advise paying close attention to the caveats Romney usually throws in when he makes the “currency manipulator” pledge, as he did Tuesday when he said that “if necessary” he would move from the symbolic act of tagging China as a currency manipulator to a concrete step such as slapping tariffs on specific Chinese goods.

    Romney’s advisers on trade policy say the point of designating China a currency manipulator would be to set a “new tone” in US-China relations.

    Romney would be putting China on notice that it either stop its unfair trade practices – such as keeping its currency artificially low to make its goods cheaper on the export market – or face US action.

    Advisers such as domestic policy director Oren Cass underscore that naming China a currency manipulator would not automatically lead to punitive measures. The designation would trigger a US-China dialogue on the yuan’s value.

    But it would be up to China, say Romney advisers, to avoid stiff US measures such as tariffs by taking actions such as letting its currency appreciate and addressing the theft of intellectual property.

    The risk, some international economists say, is that China would react in a very different way – for example, by beating the US to the punch and slapping tariffs on US goods, or by turning away from the US bond market.

    The Obama administration has followed a different approach than the one Romney advocates, pressing China through regular dialogue to allow its currency to appreciate.

    Obama said at Tuesday’s debate that because his administration has “pushed [China] hard” the yuan has appreciated 11 percent during his presidency, which is correct.

    The Obama administration has also imposed some punitive trade measures. Obama cited his 2009 action slapping tariffs on Chinese tires, and claimed his approach overall has saved jobs at home and boosted US exports to China.

    But economists generally pan actions like the tire tariffs, saying the trade-off for what Obama claimed was 1,000 jobs saved is higher tire prices for the US consumer.

    Some political analysts say Romney’s China-bashing serves another purpose: to deflect criticism from the Obama camp that Romney, the former Bain Capital CEO, built his wealth on outsourcing jobs to China.

    Obama followed that line of criticism Tuesday when he described Romney as “the last person who will be tough on China.”

    Former Secretary of State and Nixon-to-China architect Henry Kissinger may find, as he declared recently, that the campaign’s China-bashing is “deplorable,” but he and other voters can count on hearing more of it.

    Monday’s final debate of the presidential campaign, to be held in Boca Raton, Fla., will focus on foreign policy and will have a segment dedicated to the implications of the rise of China.

  • Mitt Romney to Declare China a ‘Currency Manipulator’

    US Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney has insisted that he would declare China a “currency manipulator” after entering White House.

    This is what previous US presidents both Mr. Obama and George W. Bush resisted doing.

    Despite intense pressure from Congress, this has caused speculation over Romney’s motivations.

    Is he serious, some international economists wonder, about carrying out an action they say could lead to a devastating tit-for-tat trade war and even, in the extreme, to an economic depression in the US if China reacted by no longer buying US Treasury debt?

    Some political analysts assume that Romney would simply forget his pledge once in office.

    Others say, “Don’t bet on it” – but they also advise paying close attention to the caveats Romney usually throws in when he makes the “currency manipulator” pledge, as he did Tuesday when he said that “if necessary” he would move from the symbolic act of tagging China as a currency manipulator to a concrete step such as slapping tariffs on specific Chinese goods.

    Romney’s advisers on trade policy say the point of designating China a currency manipulator would be to set a “new tone” in US-China relations.

    Romney would be putting China on notice that it either stop its unfair trade practices – such as keeping its currency artificially low to make its goods cheaper on the export market – or face US action.

    Advisers such as domestic policy director Oren Cass underscore that naming China a currency manipulator would not automatically lead to punitive measures. The designation would trigger a US-China dialogue on the yuan’s value.

    But it would be up to China, say Romney advisers, to avoid stiff US measures such as tariffs by taking actions such as letting its currency appreciate and addressing the theft of intellectual property.

    The risk, some international economists say, is that China would react in a very different way – for example, by beating the US to the punch and slapping tariffs on US goods, or by turning away from the US bond market.

    The Obama administration has followed a different approach than the one Romney advocates, pressing China through regular dialogue to allow its currency to appreciate.

    Obama said at Tuesday’s debate that because his administration has “pushed [China] hard” the yuan has appreciated 11 percent during his presidency, which is correct.

    The Obama administration has also imposed some punitive trade measures. Obama cited his 2009 action slapping tariffs on Chinese tires, and claimed his approach overall has saved jobs at home and boosted US exports to China.

    But economists generally pan actions like the tire tariffs, saying the trade-off for what Obama claimed was 1,000 jobs saved is higher tire prices for the US consumer.

    Some political analysts say Romney’s China-bashing serves another purpose: to deflect criticism from the Obama camp that Romney, the former Bain Capital CEO, built his wealth on outsourcing jobs to China.

    Obama followed that line of criticism Tuesday when he described Romney as “the last person who will be tough on China.”

    Former Secretary of State and Nixon-to-China architect Henry Kissinger may find, as he declared recently, that the campaign’s China-bashing is “deplorable,” but he and other voters can count on hearing more of it.

    Monday’s final debate of the presidential campaign, to be held in Boca Raton, Fla., will focus on foreign policy and will have a segment dedicated to the implications of the rise of China.

  • Mrs. Zenawi Refuses to Leave Presidential Palace

    The widow of former prime minister Meles Zenawi has refused to leave Ethiopia’s national palace for the country’s new leader and his family.

    According to government sources, Mrs Azeb Mesfin has ignored instructions to move to a new residence that would also be accorded full security detail.

    The government has given Mrs Azeb and her children the option of three residential villas in Addis Ababa but she is said to have refused to even visit any out of her own security concerns.

    Government officials recently wrote a letter requesting her to leave the palace for the new prime minister, Mr Hailemariam Desalegn.

    The new leader and his family are currently living in a small residential villa in the western suburb of the capital.

    Mr Hailemariam was sworn in last month after having served as interim premier since Mr Meles’ death on August 20. An internal struggle over whether to confirm him into office was said to have had the widow as one of the main players.

    Due to the delay in transferring the palace, Mr Hailemariam is forced to stay in office late in the night and head back very early in the morning to avoid being inconvenienced by the busy Addis Ababa street that leads from his current home to his office.

    He is reportedly also avoiding inconveniencing city residents and uses less security detail than his predecessor.

    The government has deployed tight security around his current home but wants him to move to the more guarded palace.

    Mrs Azeb is one of the top officials and a former rebel fighter under the Tigrian Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), one of the four coalition partners of the powerful ruling party, during the 17-year armed struggle against Mengistu Hailemariam’s Marxist regime.

    A mother of three, she secured a parliamentary seat in 2005 and was re-elected in 2010.

    She also heads the multi-billion dollar ruling party-owned business conglomerate, EFFORT.

  • Mrs. Zenawi Refuses to Leave Presidential Palace

    The widow of former prime minister Meles Zenawi has refused to leave Ethiopia’s national palace for the country’s new leader and his family.

    According to government sources, Mrs Azeb Mesfin has ignored instructions to move to a new residence that would also be accorded full security detail.

    The government has given Mrs Azeb and her children the option of three residential villas in Addis Ababa but she is said to have refused to even visit any out of her own security concerns.

    Government officials recently wrote a letter requesting her to leave the palace for the new prime minister, Mr Hailemariam Desalegn.

    The new leader and his family are currently living in a small residential villa in the western suburb of the capital.

    Mr Hailemariam was sworn in last month after having served as interim premier since Mr Meles’ death on August 20. An internal struggle over whether to confirm him into office was said to have had the widow as one of the main players.

    Due to the delay in transferring the palace, Mr Hailemariam is forced to stay in office late in the night and head back very early in the morning to avoid being inconvenienced by the busy Addis Ababa street that leads from his current home to his office.

    He is reportedly also avoiding inconveniencing city residents and uses less security detail than his predecessor.

    The government has deployed tight security around his current home but wants him to move to the more guarded palace.

    Mrs Azeb is one of the top officials and a former rebel fighter under the Tigrian Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), one of the four coalition partners of the powerful ruling party, during the 17-year armed struggle against Mengistu Hailemariam’s Marxist regime.

    A mother of three, she secured a parliamentary seat in 2005 and was re-elected in 2010.

    She also heads the multi-billion dollar ruling party-owned business conglomerate, EFFORT.

  • Malawi, Tanzania Border Dispute Deepens

    Tanzania has sent yet another invitation to Malawi for talks in Dar es Salaam aimed at resolving the border dispute between the two countries which have been entangled in the Lake Nyasa ownership.

    John Haule, Tanzanias official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation disclosed wednesday.

    Malawi failed to show up for talks that were scheduled to take place last week in Dar es Salaam, an indication Malawi could still be reluctant to get back to the negotiation table over the Lake Nyasa dispute.

    Malawians have declared that they preferred to take the issue to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), a United Nation’s body whose Article 36 Tanzania, though a member, isn’t a signatory to.

    Article 36 of the ICJ requires all parties to a dispute to accept ICJ’s jurisdiction and declarations on all legal disputes concerning interpretation of a treaty or any question of international law.

    “We understand they might have failed to show up due to the misunderstanding over some issues, which prompted President Joyce Banda to announce suspension of talks early this month. But we have invited them again for talks that should take place on October 27,” said Mr Haule.